The Spy Who Changed The World by Mike Rossiter

The Spy Who Changed The World by Mike RossiterRating: 4 / 5 stars
Format: Paperback
Published: 12th March 2015
Amazon | Goodreads

The world first heard of Klaus Fuchs, the head of theoretical physics at the British Research Establishment at Harwell in February 1950 when he appeared at the Old Bailey, accused of passing secrets to the Soviet Union. For over sixty years disinformation and lies surrounded the story of Klaus Fuchs as the Governments of Britain, the United States and Russia all tried to cover up the truth about his treachery.

he Spy Who Changed the World unravels the truth about Fuchs and reveals for the first time his long career of espionage. It proves that he played a pivotal role in Britain’s bomb programme in the race to keep up with the United States in the atomic age, and that he revealed vital secrets about the atom bomb, as well as the immensely destructive hydrogen bomb to the Soviet Government.

This was a really fascinating book, its hard to believe that it actually happened. It feels more like a spy novel than an account of real events. Rossiter did a really good job of collating all the information available into a readable narrative. No easy feat considering the amount of information still classified.

I really enjoyed this book. It makes you feel sorry for Fuchs, he was undoubtably a brilliant physicist and an even better spy. Fuchs must have believed that what he was doing would help to achieve a balance between East and West. The only thing I would liked to have known more about is why he decided to turn himself in to MI6, unfortunately since Fuchs and his wife are now both dead that is something we will never know.

Buy The Spy Who Changed The World on Amazon

Thanks for reading.
Find me on Twitter, Facebook, Goodreads.

*I received a copy of this book from Headline in exchange for an honest review.

Advertisements

7 Responses to “The Spy Who Changed The World by Mike Rossiter”

  1. Lord of Mirkwood

    Sounds very interesting! I do wonder how revealing the bomb’s secrets to the Soviets could constitute an attempt to bring peace and balance; even without the advantage of hindsight, he probably should have known (based on historical examples, for example Britain and Germany before World War I) that it would lead to a tense arms race.

    Reply
    • bluchickenninja

      I don’t think he necessarily did it for peace, but it did bring balance in that the Americans and Soviets had the same weapons. I mean if America were the only ones with nuclear bombs they would automatically win whatever conflict they got in to.

      Reply
  2. Athena

    WOW this sounds like a great read I will try and get my hands on it thanks for sharing 🙂

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Basic HTML is allowed. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS